[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] RC Multiple primaries and a single seconday

To: "'Bob May'" <bobmay@nethere.com>, <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] RC Multiple primaries and a single seconday
From: "Jerry" <wa4guu@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:56:55 -0400
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <006301c6d9db$dade3a20$ddadfea9@amd>
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

	Technically I guess you are right. But masking is much more
practical.  You can remove the mask and have a good telescope again.

	In practice a Newtonian combines multiple images. The spider vanes
mask the mirror into sectors.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob May
 
Yes, but you don't have a multiple mirror telescope then!


_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- Re: [ATM] RC Multiple primaries and a single seconday
  - From: "Bob May" <bobmay@nethere.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] RC Multiple primaries and a single seconday
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Odd collimation problem
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] RC Multiple primaries and a single seconday
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] RC Multiple primaries and a single seconday
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread