[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] A Null Test



Hi Richard,

Sunday, September 3, 2006, 1:50:24 PM, you wrote:


RS> I thought I'd present some early findings...

RS> ...

RS> The basic layout of the test is similar to a Ross Null Test in that the
RS> light passes through the three lenses on both the forward and return
RS> directions  (See Peter Ceravolo's article.).  For these setups, I selected a
RS> 500 mm diameter mirror with conic constants of -0.8 to -1.2.
RS> This range of conics constants cover most of several designs:
RS> Ritchey-Chretien (both Cassegrain and Gregorian), Classical Cassegrain, and
RS> Newtonian.  The LPX309 planoconvex lens is nearest the source/knife with the
RS> LPK065 planoconcave lens in the middle.  An example prescription
RS> is:

RS> Surf      Radius   Thickness    Glass    Diameter   Conic   Note

RS>  OBJ     298.476     76.2331                    4       0   source
RS>    1    Infinity        10.4      BK7          95       0   LPX309
RS>    2     -155.62    29.31369                   95       0
RS>    3    Infinity           3      BK7        94.2       0   LPK065
RS>    4    311.2356    35.82609                 94.2       0
RS>    5    Infinity        14.1      BK7       101.6       0   LPX303
RS>    6     -131.75    2035.169                101.6       0
RS>  STO    Infinity    12.49376                  500       0   stop at
RS> mirror edge
RS>    8       -2500   -12.49376   MIRROR         500    -1.2   mirror
RS>    9    Infinity   -2035.169                  500       0
RS>   10     -131.75       -14.1      BK7    98.14704       0   LPX303
RS>   11    Infinity   -35.82609             96.33898       0
RS>   12    311.2356          -3      BK7    75.90638       0   LPK065
RS>   13    Infinity   -29.31369             74.31415       0
RS>   14     -155.62       -10.4      BK7    59.47545       0   LPX309
RS>   15    Infinity    -76.2331             56.18785       0
RS>  IMA     298.476                         4.009802       0   knife

I'm commenting in the dark a little, Richard, as I didn't see
your original post, only Donalds follow up. This looks like an
OIffner Null test, but with three lenses rather than two. What
does the extra lens do?

Here's the Offner setup I traced for a 16" RC primary :


Surf     Radius    Thickness   Glass      Diameter       Conic
 OBJ   Infinity     518.5576                     0           0
   1   Infinity           10     BK7            50           0
   2     -77.52     185.6841                    50           0
   3     417.54            5     BK7            24           0
   4    -417.54     20.66401                    24           0
   5   Infinity         2400              1.669547           0
 STO      -2400        -2400  MIRROR           400   -1.144162
   7   Infinity    -20.66401              1.669708           0
   8    -417.54           -5     BK7            24           0
   9     417.54    -185.6841                    24           0
  10     -77.52          -10     BK7            50           0
  11   Infinity    -518.5534                    50           0
 IMA   Infinity                        0.000714256           0

 A good merit function operand to use is RAID on the mirror, and
 TRAX, after using PMAG to ensure unity magnification.
 
-- 

Best regards,
  Richard in the UK

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/