[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ATM] Why not metal mirrors? (was Beryllium)
...in case I haven't posted this to the atm list in the past - btw, there is
extensive discussion of aluminum mirrors several times in the archives...
Mel Bartels
Subj: Tuning a telescope Section: Telescopes/Hardware
To: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270 Tuesday, June 13, 1995 11:04:14 AM
From: THOMAS WAINEO, 70671,3264 #223124
Mel: I have Colen's book. The mirror has never gave a good image due to poor
figure. I read
that they have placed a second layer of plating. We tried doing second
layers and never had
success. If anything goes wrong we strip and correct things on the base
material and replate.
That mirror has a tapered back to make a thin edge. You have a CTE mismatch
between Al
and Ni. You need to have the edge strong to overcome this mismatch. Al
mirrors should have
thick edges. Lunar and Planetary Observatory made a comment that they are
happy with the
images of their 60 inch nirror and are making another. Both are in 1965 Sky
an& Tel. If you
want the same stiffnes as 6 to 1 in pyrex, you use 10 to 1 diameter
thickness ratio in Al. For a
10, I would use 1 inch thick 6061-T6 plate. That would make a 980 lb 5 inch
thick 50 inch
mirror. That much weight may be way too much. A 3 inch thick is 589 lb and a
2 inch thick 392
lbs. The 2 inch Al would have the stiffness of 3.333 pyrex. You may be happy
with a pyrex blank
that thick so 2 inch Al would be alright. Anything thicker, you may have to
hire a rigger everytime
you set up a telescope. That is 25 to 1 or 0.4 inch thick for a 10 inch
mirror. My feeling is that if
a 1/2 inch plate (4 lbs) works for a 10 inch, then you could go for a 2 inch
thick 50 incher. The
GOES Next Scan mirror weighs 4 lbs for 20 by 12 by 2 inch thick Beryllium
plus Ni plate. That
has machined pockets with 1/16 inch walls and 0.1 inch base. The shop made
one from Al to
check out the programing of the CNC machine. It was Ni plated and polished.
Al has 1/4 the
stiffness of Be. I was surprised how strong it was when it was polished.
There was a
company that offered Al blanks for telescope mirrors by claiming that a good
polish can be
obtained. No one could make it to their claim. I would try to find a copy of
the book when I am at
the shop. BTW, why angle a diagonal at 45 degrees? You may use a little
bigger and angle at
30 to get a 60 degree fold. That would be better than two mirrors. Then you
are angled to look
up and do not need to stand as high on that ladder. - Tom
Subj: celestron or meade? Section: Telescopes/Hardware
To: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270 Tuesday, June 06, 1995 6:04:07 PM
From: THOMAS WAINEO, 70671,3264 #222021
Mel: Use 6061-T6 plate. A 10 to 1 thickness ratio has the stiffness of 6 to
1 pyrex. Talk
to your local Al supplier, machine shops, plating shops, and heat treating
shops.
Usuually they know each other. Talk to them about a 50 inch mirror as well
as a 10 inch.
I want to send you a sample of a electroless nickel plated Al mirror 1 1/2
diameter by 1/4
inch thick so you can show them what you want done. With the sample, the
procedure
Applied Optics used for 25 years to stablize Al mirrors, and some 1 micron
Aluminum
Oxide polishing powder to try. Electroless nickel is used in so many
industries that you
may have local firms to help you. Can you give me an address? - Tom
Subj: Aluminum Mirrors Section: Telescopes/Hardware
To: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270 Saturday, March 04, 1995 1:04:19 AM
From: THOMAS WAINEO, 70671,3264 #208105
Mel: What you do not want is a temperature gradiant. Metal mirrors are
designed for
thermal emissivity or absorbtion equally front and back. When there is a
reflective
coating in front, the back is painted flat black. The back faces the housing
and air and
gains or loose energy from it. In process for stablization, mirror are
cycled -100 F and
+200 F with holds at each temp long enough for mirrors to reach those
temperatures.
With a surface temperature probe, you would know the hold time. A finished
mirror is
cycled 20 degrees more on high and low then it will ever see in use. The
should be no
figure change. Military is -60 F and +160 F. With water heating/cooling, you
would be
doing a overkill. You would find in the cycles how fast the mirrors change
in
temperatures. GOES NEXT, MIAI tank mirrors, and the Brady Fighting Velicle
mirrors
have backs painted flat black. The idea is the heat/cool exchange front and
back are
equal and there is no temperature gradiant. Those mirrors are flats and
temperature
gradiant causes curvature. You do not have this problem with a focusing
telescope.
About 20 years ago a firm was making 60 inch Al spherical mirrors with the
correction for
spherical done by a convex aspheric secondary. I know of another 60 inch in
Italy. I do
not know of any visual Al scopes. With a high thermal coductivity, you would
have less a
problem with a metal mirror than glass in regards to unequal temperatures
through out
the blank. I guess the thing to do is to make 2 ten inch scopes of the same
quality and
focal length and see if you could tell a differencve in performance. I am
willing to bet that
you would not. - Tom
Subj: Aluminum Mirrors Section: Telescopes/Hardware
To: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270 Thursday, March 02, 1995 4:18:01 PM
From: THOMAS WAINEO, 70671,3264 #207905
Mel: The metal mirrors I have made are used on a test tunnel optical bench,
in a vacuum
test chamber and cooled to liquid nitrogen to -270 F, and in space. I do not
recall any
used in outdoor air except military. The thermal conductivity in BTU/(hr ft
F) is 99 for AL
and 0.59 for Duran 50 (Scott Glass pyrex eq.). The ratio is 167.8 which
means that much
faster ratio of heat or cooling. To me, it means that Al will change that
much faster than
glass. The specific heat in BTU/(lb F) is 0.23 for Al and 0.20 for Duran 50.
Not much
difference, but it means that they both have 1/5 the thermal mass of water.
I do not think
you want to use fans, the Al will change so fast that it will go below the
dew point faster
than glass. You may need the thermal mass to keep it warm and use heaters
rather
than fans to keep it above the dew point. Does your car get wet from dew
often in your
area? Since Ni reflects 60%, it would reflect as much as a 41 inch AL + SiO
coated
mirror. Honest, I do not know why Al mirrors are not considered for
telescope optics. For
a professional mirror material cost is very minor consideration since the
rest ot the
scope, shelter, and site are far more. For the amateur the material is 1/3
or 1/2 the total
cost. - Tom
Subj: Tuning a telescope Section: Telescopes/Hardware
To: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270 Wednesday, June 14, 1995 1:45:10 AM
From: THOMAS WAINEO, 70671,3264 #223218
Mel: Another thing to consider. If 400 lbs bothers you, pockets can be
milled in the back. As
long as you do not go overboard in lightweighting, you do not loose much
stiffness. A 400 lb
mirror can be 300 lbs or 75% of solid. So far I have been talking flats. You
should consider the
volume of the curve. So you would be a little less. How does a 280 lb 50
inch sound? The flat
should be made from aluminum as well. Make it from 1 1/4 plate. About $180
for polish and
figure should do it. About 25 years ago, I did a 36 by 2 inch pyrex. It
bends by waves in a sling
mount. No problem since the mirror was cut up into 8 inch off axis
sections. - Tom
FROM: TOM WAINEO, 70671,3264
TO: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270
DATE: 6/15/95 6:39 AM
Re: metal mirrors
Mel You can have pockets milled just over floatation triangles so you have
bridges of thick ribs between floatatrion points. It may be best if you have
a
hole in the mirror so some radial support can be in the hole rather than
have
the edge do all the mirror radial support. Soft metals do not do well in
loose
abrasive grinding. Use sandpaper on pitch. Just wet a little with acetone
and
stick on. The fine sandpaper gives a shine that can be Foucault tested. If
you have a nice spherical base surface, you can polish right after plating.
It polishes so fast that I often figure with sandpaper laps. Great that a
little less diagonal tilt help so much. Do you know anyone that does finite
element moldeling? It takes out a lot of guess work out of mirror structural
design. - Tom
FROM: TOM WAINEO, 70671,3264
TO: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270
DATE: 6/15/95 4:27 PM
Re: metal mirrors
Mel: Most engineering colleges have cources in finite element analysis. If
you can locate a instructor for the course, I am sure he could help. It may
be possible to have a grad student do it for a master's thesis on you
mirror.
The face plate thickness should be at least 1/10 the maximum pocket gap. A
3/4 base thickness would be 7 1/2 max gap. Better a 6 inch. Now how many
points would that be? The center hole can fit a lawn mower inner tube and
the
outside sling a adjustable spring to balance the support of center and edge.
You should be spherical to better than 0.0005 overall. A big bar spherometer
can check it. It has to have close to the same reading anywhere you place
it.
I start with 220 grit sandpaper and finish with 400. Your nickel plating
would
be 0.005 minimum and 0.007 maximum. On a 10 or 12, I polish that much off in
80 hrs. Know what you are doing and do not play games with it. The plating
polishs with 1 micron at least 3 times faster than glass. You big problem
with
astigmatism is that they may clamp the mirror too tight doing machining. A 3
ft bar spherometer can detect astigmatism. You never plate if you are not
sure. The shops have big air bearings to rotate a mirror level. Those
indicaters can detect a fringe and plot as you rotate. A 1/10,000 inch
indicater shows 4 waves per tenth and on a 3 ft bar spherometer can assure
you are spherical. All this have been done in the pro shops for many years.
No big deal for them, but for a amateur? - Tom
FROM: TOM WAINEO, 70671,3264
TO: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270
DATE: 6/16/95 7:58 AM
Re: metal mirrors
Mel: Any precision machine shop will do. I have suggested Tom Clark at
Tectron Machining. Just be sure that they have CNC equipment. The 1 micron
alumina is mixed with water and polished with GUGOLZ 64 in a A/C shop. We do
find some astigmatism from all large machined blanks. Most are less than
0.003. You take it out in grinding and finish in polishing. We do try to be
less than 0.0005 overall before plating. - Tom
Mel: A 54 point floatation cell has 18 triangles. 6 covers the inside and 12
outside. A 50 inch F/4 with a 12 inch hole has a 3/4 inch depth which leaves
the center only 1 1/4 thick. A design may work where the center 6 triangles
support a solid area. The outside 18 support a webbed structure equal in
weight per area to each of the 6 inside sectional areas. There are 24
support
points with ribs connecting to the solid inside area. That sounds simple
enough to make. I see nothing gained by pocketing the inside area and a
floation cell works only when supporting equal weights. - Tom
Mel: When you start a machined Al mirror, you grind all over with 220 grit
sandpaper on pitch to remove the tool marks. You keep changing the sandpaper
when worn out until it is even all over. Then switch to 400 to smoothen and
then 600 to shine it. When you can see your face, then you can foucault
test it. It will scatter lots of light, but you can see the cut off shadows.
Tom Clark has a machine shop big enough to do a 40 inch for Applied Optics.
They have closed, but the key people are now in a new firm called Manasota
Optics. They bought most of Applied Optics equipment, but do not plate at
this time. Vendors are now plating for them. Tom Clark is Tectron telescopes
and the yard scope owner. If the base has a good figure, there will be very
little errors to polish from the plating. The plating is done at about 190
degree F. The mirror is baked at 350 F for 6 hrs to harden the nickel and
strengthen the bond of Al to Ni. We have made mirrors without the bake. I
have not found any difference in hardness. Best that the mirror is
cycled -100
F to +200 F 5 times as done before plating as well to assure stablility. It
is
done in computer controled temperature chamber. Nickel can be plated to any
thickness. Most often done 0.005 minimum to 0.007 maximum for mirrors. You
need a plating threaded hole in the side for hanging in a plating tank. We
have made mirrors with 0.001 nickel, but the risk of polish thru is high. I
was suggesting 2 inch thick blank in Al which will have the stiffness of a 3
1/3 inch glass blank. I consider that the absolute minimum. It would be
about the stiffness of a 40 inch of 2 inches thick in glass. If you can do a
thicker blank, so much the better. With a FAX machine, you can get material
quotes from many suppliers. If you FAX a drawing, you got machined prices.
Machine shops can shop around for Al prices as part of the quote to machine
the
blank. Melissa Evans may ask around at T who does what on the west coast. I
only know this side of USA. Nickel plating costs roughly as much as vacuum
coating. The big advanage is that you can use the mirror as is at 60%
and be absolute curtain the you want to coat to get 88% I am 3 miles
away from Tom Clark's shop. Want me to talk to him for some machinist
feedback infro? - Tom
Mel: Electroless nickel was originally made for corosin resistance
coating inside of huge pipes for oil refinerys. Someone on the west coast
did
those 60 inch mirrors and the 27 ft mirror that Tinsley made. I read in
Laser
Focus World that a firm in Redwood City Ca did electrolerss nickel for lamp
reflecters. They article says that they had to be polished to 10 A rms.
Aluminum is made in Washington state usiung cheap electricity from the Grand
Coule Dam. I was thinking of asking Shipley who supplies the plating
chemicals
who has big tanks for a 50 inch in your area. Have you checked the yellow
pages under plating? You mentioned $7 a pound for Al, I am sure it is less
than half that for big plates. It may come in 4 ft slaps which may limit you
to a 48 inch. You may be surprised to know that I have made 3 or 4 times
more
metal mirrors than glass. When you need big fast mirrors, it is cheaper in
machined metal than glass by many times. I will stop by and have a chat with
Tom Clark in a week or so. Will let you know what I find out. I know all the
people at Manasota Optics. I can have the 10 inch included in the heat
treat,
plating, and cycling of other work to save you money. It does not cost them
anything more if there is room for another mirror in the chamber. - Tom
Mel: That is close to $4 a pound and is about right. It makes a 2 inch thick
about $1466. If you use a 54 point floatation, then you can do a 48 by 2
inch
thick blank. Lightweighting makes the mount more complicated. You have to
balance the weight of each floatation section so all gives the mirror equal
support. Talk to Bill Brady at Capricorn Optics. He has plating tanbks big
enough. Tell him I told you to call. He is north of Boston Ma in Georgetown
Ma 508-352-2699. He is doing big aluminum mirrors over 4 ft diameter. - Tom
FROM: TOM WAINEO, 70671,3264
TO: Mel Bartels, 73422,3270
DATE: 6/19/95 10:01 AM
Re: metal mirror
Mel: Talked to Tom Clark on the phone. He says Al is priced roughly $3.50 a
pound. Stock comes in 2 or 3 inches thick. That means a 3 inch 50 incher
costs about $2000 for 590 lbs and a 2 inch $1400 for 393 lbs. I found a
formula that says the F/4 curve takes out 70 lbs and a 10 inch hole another
10
lbs which would make the 2 inch blank 313 lbs with hole and 323 without. It
may be best to use a 2 inch solid blank to save on pocketing costs. - Tom
Mel: your best bet is platers near optical industry. The Northeast, around
Tucson Az, and LA anbd SF in Calif. If someone has a ready to go tank, than
it will cost about $1200 or about the price of a vacuum coating. It really
depends on the plating tank economics. The price will have a wide range. The
advanage with nickel plate is that the mirror can be star tested with the
60%
reflection. - Tom
Dear Mr. Bartels
Try Jim Logston of EMF corp. @ 719-576-7733.
Jim EN plated a 23' diameter aluminium solar simulator mirror for Tinsley
using the mirror as the plating tank. It was an interesting project to say
the least.
Reguards Jim Kennon, Tinsley
Mel: Electroless nickel was originally developed for corrosin resistance in
oil refinery pipes. You would find large tanks in companies who service the
industry. Those actuators work under computer control with feedback from
interferometery. Remember the Sky & Tel article about bending a spherical
mirror by pushing in to the back center while the front edge sits on a O
ring.
It would work by a vacuum pump as Schmidt did in making correctors. I do
think
a large sphere can be bent parabolic. I have made toric mirrors by bending
and
polishing. Ever see how much a big piece of thin window glass bends? I
wonder
if it is possible to bend from flat to parabolic just by vacuum deformation?
I
guess it is possible to buy a big thin mirror and bend as a mangin mirror.
Mirrors and windows are made by float and roll and may be flat enough to
make into mirrors. I see it working for one radius and thickness. Any
other radius and/or thickness would be over or undercorrected. You
may need some figuring on the front surface. A 50 inch F/5 has only a 5/8
sagitta. Can that be bent from a 1/4 inch plate mirror without fracture? Is
it worth looking into? If it does work, it may make big scopes
cheap. My bathroom mirror is 4 by 6 ft and 1/4 inch thick. Can that be cut
round for a scope mirror by vacuum deformation? A 2 arc second imaging
mirror has to have slopes no more than one second. That is 1/4 wave per inch
or a wave over 2 inches. I have seen some pretty good plate glass, You could
check it as a flat by pointing a scope at it face up on a O ring. Any
gravity
sag can be focused out. You would have to be near the normal to not get
astigmatism from curvature. Pretty wild idea? - Tom
-------- end enclosure ------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This HTML document was created by GT_HTML 6.0d 02/18/97 8:19 PM.
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/