[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Binocular telescope co-collimation

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Binocular telescope co-collimation
From: Michael Lindner <mikell@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:47:34 -0400
Cc: Rich Simons <entos@bellsouth.net>
In-reply-to: <004d01c5c8e0$abb12530$8c01a8c0@Mickey>
List-Archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <004d01c5c8e0$abb12530$8c01a8c0@Mickey>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Tue October 4 2005 8:39 am, Rich Simons wrote:
> You pretty much understand it correctly, Paul.

Forgive my naivete, but isn't the "sweet spot" on a newt small, and thus 
wouldn't miscollimating one scope produce an inferior image?

-- 
Michael Lindner
http://www.starastronomy.org *** http://home.att.net/~mikel
http://www.atmsite.org *** http://www.atmlist.net
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Binocular telescope co-collimation
  - From: "Rich Simons" <entos@bellsouth.net>

References:
- Re: [ATM] Binocular telescope co-collimation
  - From: "Rich Simons" <entos@bellsouth.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] There seems to be a reoccurring motif among this list.
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Quantifying visual seeing error
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] Binocular telescope co-collimation
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Binocular telescope co-collimation
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread