[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM Re: Razor blade rules-

To: "Richard Schwartz" <richas@earthlink.net>, "David Harbour" <scarab2@cox.net>
Subject: Re: ATM Re: Razor blade rules-
From: "Bill Kelley" <flex@commspeed.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:46:06 -0700
Cc: <ATM@shore.net>
References: <002701c3988f$c6456dd0$a41d0c44@xyloryctes> <001501c398ad$1402ae30$17e2b3d1@starzv2zzychda>
Reply-To: "Bill Kelley" <flex@commspeed.net>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net


Bravo Richard-
Don't let him get away with such heresy.
Bill


>
> You fool!  You are propagating heresy!   Everybody knows that you get more
> reliable answers from software like sicktests and Tex because it can tell
> you that your mirror is good to 1/17.3987561 waves and that the Strehl
ratio
> is 1.02753.  (The latter number is for a really, really superior mirror.)
> And the answers MUST be correct; after all, they come out of a computer!
>

References:
- ATM: Razor blade rules-
  - From: "David Harbour" <scarab2@cox.net>
- ATM Re: Razor blade rules-
  - From: "Richard Schwartz" <richas@earthlink.net>

Prev by Author: Re: ATM Matching Ronchigrams
Next by Author: Re: ATM Grinding problem?
Prev by thread: ATM Re: Razor blade rules-
Next by thread: Re: ATM: Razor blade rules-
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread