[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM 22" binocular design

To: "ATM List" <atm@shore.net>
Subject: Re: ATM 22" binocular design
From: Marinus van der Lugt <rienvdlugt@cistron.nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:59:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <NDBBIPBHPLNKDGKAGFKGCEPNCHAA.sayre@foothill.net>
Reply-To: Marinus van der Lugt <rienvdlugt@cistron.nl>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net


I am amazed. Truly amazed. In a positive sense!

After I overcame the first shock though my first thought was
"body heat". With the 22" monocular you are at least standing
to the side. With the bino you are standing directly under the
light path. Maybe someone could comment whether this is
a problem or not.

Best,
Rien.

BTW: Calling a 22" bino portable gives a whole new meaning
to the word :-)
(Sorry, could not resist)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATM 22" binocular design
  - From: "Charvell" <charvell@sofnet.com>
- Re: ATM 22" binocular design
  - From: "James Lerch" <jlerch1@tampabay.rr.com>
- Re: ATM 22" binocular design
  - From: mike coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>

References:
- ATM 22" binocular design
  - From: "Bruce Sayre" <sayre@foothill.net>

Prev by Author: Re: ATM baffling-do you?
Next by Author: Re: ATM Why use glass?
Prev by thread: ATM 22" binocular design
Next by thread: Re: ATM 22" binocular design
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread