[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[ATM] Mirror Cells - Springs vs. Push/Pull

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: [ATM] Mirror Cells - Springs vs. Push/Pull
From: jeffmorgan@mindspring.com
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:41:34 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
List-Archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-To: jeffmorgan@mindspring.com
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

I'm about to make a new mirror cell for an 8" mirror. Materials will be 3/4" Baltic Birch treated with polyester resin. I was wondering if there was any comments on using collimation pull bolts opposed by springs (which seems to be the predominate method) vs. using push/pull bolt pairs like refractor cells use.

Thanks,

Jeff Morgan
Prescott, AZ
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Mirror Cells - Springs vs. Push/Pull
  - From: "Don Clement" <clement.focuser@verizon.net>
- Re: [ATM] Mirror Cells - Springs vs. Push/Pull
  - From: Ross Sackett <rsackett00@yahoo.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] More on aperature stops
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] ATM-Could use some Flocking advice
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] Mirror Cell
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Mirror Cells - Springs vs. Push/Pull
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread