[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
From: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:38:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <436A7BBE.3070401@rcn.com>
List-Archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <001801c5cf90$5b6ae6e0$1600a8c0@amd> <003301c5dfdf$b68815c0$1600a8c0@amd> <000b01c5dfe4$bd7583e0$5929d418@yourze8cxvr8tt> <004801c5e0ac$626c7940$1600a8c0@amd><436A7BBE.3070401@rcn.com>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Richard F.L.R. Snashall wrote:

>>Move the lens pair farther from the primary (ala Schmidt corrector);
>> From what I've heard, there should be an optimum astigmatism point.
>>    
>>
74"??
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
  - From: "Bob May" <bobmay@nethere.com>
- Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
  - From: "Jean-Guy Moreau" <jgmoreau@cablevision.qc.ca>
- Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
  - From: "Bob May" <bobmay@nethere.com>
- Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
  - From: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Luri-Houghton prescriptions.
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread