[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] A more or less new optical test

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] A more or less new optical test
From: mbartels@bbastrodesigns.com
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:15:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051101094646.05b1a2d0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
List-Archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1303152.1130789306524.JavaMail.tomcat@pne-ps3-sn2><6.2.3.4.2.20051101094646.05b1a2d0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> lists three assumptions that need to be made to make them 
> approximately equal. Those same three assumptions would apply to the 
> Foucault test since the underlying physics and mathematics are the 
> same. The only difference is the form of the mathematical description 


Can I trouble you to briefly list the 3 assumptions?

Mel Bartels
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] A more or less new optical test
  - From: Michael Peck <mpeck1@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- Re: [ATM] A more or less new optical test
  - From: Michael Peck <mpeck1@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] telescope emulation software
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Iron tool
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] A more or less new optical test
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] A more or less new optical test
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread