Re: [ATM] Hugs and Kisses II

["Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>]

vladimir sacek wrote:

>
>
>Every design consists of elements' radii, thicknesses, indici and
>interspaces. I don't know 
>why it is good for a software to have abbreviations for those that
>doesn't relate to the original word.
>But it would definitely be more useful if the design posts here would
>have software output 
>translated into a clear and readable form, if it is not given as such
>originally.
>
In view of Michael's response, then:

As long as you are suggesting sagging and some are suggesting two
lenses up front:

the "hugs" (O) version unMak Cass:

    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/unmak1-06x.len
    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/unmak1-06x.txt

the "kisses" (X) version unMak Cass:

    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/unmak1-07x.len
    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/unmak1-07x.txt

At least it has a good Photopic Strehl ratio: 0.992 at the
edge of the 42 mm diameter field.

>
>Vlad
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/