[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM Re: coatings & such + question ( long )

To: hclaus@clausing.com
Subject: Re: ATM Re: coatings & such + question ( long )
From: Ken Lowther <s0109366@cc.ysu.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 20:17:29 -0400 (EDT)
cc: atm@shore.net
In-Reply-To: <199705280338.WAA00562@neuman.interaccess.com>
Reply-To: Ken Lowther <s0109366@cc.ysu.edu>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net

On Tue, 27 May 1997 hclaus@clausing.com wrote:

> 
>     The staining left behind appeared to be some type of Aluminum Oxide.  
      The oxide was non reactive in HCl or Ferric Chloride.
> 

Just curious.  Maybe the definition of "stain" is confusing because I view
it as something "soaked in".  What kind of physical damage do we actually
have here.  I am assuming something that changed the surface of the
mirror?

Ken Lowther  
s0109366@cc.ysu.edu
Youngstown, Ohio  USA

References:
- ATM Re: coatings & such + question ( long )
  - From: hclaus@clausing.com

Prev by Author: Re: ATM "The New S&T": A suggestion.
Next by Author: Re: ATM Darksky association
Prev by thread: Re: ATM Staining of glass?
Next by thread: Re: ATM Re: coatings & such + question ( long )
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread