[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: ATM "The New S&T"
At 08:38 AM 5/27/97 -0400, Tom.Stock@gsbsc.gensig.com wrote:
>
>
>
>>P.S. Does this mean that you are going to drop 'Telescope' from the name
>>of your magazine?
>
>No, exactly opposite. The name of the magazine will become "Meade
Telescopes"
>and there will be no room for talk of stars and things.
>
>-tom
Well, at least we are being fair and balanced. Two weeks ago we were
shitting on Patti Kurtz and Astronomy magazine; it is only fair that we
crap all over the other guys too.
Really folks, how can you expect folks to take us seriously when we
denigrate the people we seek to impress or convince. Please stick to facts,
curtail the flaming, and try to do something constructive.
Again, submit articles. What I've seen mentioned so far is that the
articles being printed are irrelevant and are one-of-a-kind projects. You
sound like you would not want to read those articles anyway.
Isn't it odd ???
Dave
David B. Toth, MD ve3gyq@amsat.org
Lima, Ohio
"We are all ignorant, only in different ways, and no one is as
ignorant as an educated man outside his own field" - Will Rogers