[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Focal Length Accuracy

Good morning Jim,

You have asked why I want the focal length to be as close to 36 inches
as possible.

No particular reason really. Just practice. 8-)

-Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: atm-bounces@atmlist.net 
> [mailto:atm-bounces@atmlist.net] On Behalf Of Jim Burrows
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:10 PM
> To: atm@atmlist.net
> Subject: Re: [ATM] Focal Length Accuracy
> 
> At 2007-05-22 10:20 -0500, Anthony Anconetani wrote:
> 
> >  1) Is now the time to get the focal length as close to 36 
> inches as 
> >possible?
> 
> Why do you have to have the "focal length as close to 36" as 
> possible"?  Has the OTA already been built?  Otherwise, 
> there's no requirement on the focal length - long, look at 
> planets; short, look at dim fuzzies.
> 
>          -- Jim Burrows
>          -- http://home.earthlink.net/~burrjaw
>          -- mailto:burrjaw@earthlink.net
>          -- Seattle N47.4723 W122.3662 (WGS84)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
> 
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/