Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight

[Ross Sackett <rsackett00@yahoo.com>]

--- mbartels@bbastrodesigns.com wrote:
> I'm thinking the difference has to be in two areas:
> 1) you have smaller moment of inertia
> 2) i was doing early CCD imaging so my vibration
> criteria was very strict

I think you are right--especally because my scope is
purely for visual use, so i can tolerate much more
vibration and flexure,

Ross
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/