[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight
From: mbartels@bbastrodesigns.com
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
In-reply-to: <57986.33729.qm@web54102.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <57986.33729.qm@web54102.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> Acknowledged.  I am surprised it didn't work better
> for you since from your pictures it looks overbuilt.


Well, yesterday's 1996-minimalist is today's 2007-overBuilt <smile>!

I'm thinking the difference has to be in two areas:
1) you have smaller moment of inertia
2) i was doing early CCD imaging so my vibration criteria was very strict

Mel Bartels
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight
  - From: Ross Sackett <rsackett00@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight
  - From: Ross Sackett <rsackett00@yahoo.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight
Next by Author: [ATM] the future of amateur telescope making and amateur astronomy
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] New minimalist single-pole 18" ultralight
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread