[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ATM] Reducing the outer zone in figuring - I did it! My first mirror is done!
That is some great looking mirror!
You will have to figure out what it was you did right on the 12.5".
I would guess the center strokes smoothed the correction across zone 2, 3
and 4 and the center work as Jim recommended increased the conic. All
numbers moved in the correct direction.
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: atm-bounces@atmlist.net [mailto:atm-bounces@atmlist.net] On Behalf Of
David Steinhauer
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 10:55 PM
To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: [ATM] Reducing the outer zone in figuring - I did it! My first
mirror is done!
I don't understand how I finally got the outer zone to cooperate, but I
did it, and my mirror is done! According to FigureXP, it is has 1/23
P-V wavefront error, and a Strehl ratio of 0.995. Here are the numbers
(yes, verified again and again and averaged):
Diameter: 6 inches
Focal length: 29.6 inches (f/4.9)
Zone KE reading Ideal reading Delta
1 0.0000 0.000
2 0.0190 0.021 0.019 = 90%
3 0.0395 0.040 0.021 = 107%
4 0.0563 0.059 0.017 = 88%
After my last email I did 1/6 to 1/4 diameter center over center strokes
with the mirror on top and lots of downward pressure, trying to bring it
back closer to a sphere. I did the Foucault measurements, and couldn't
quite believe it, so I did the measurements two more times. Yes indeed,
the outer zone correction grew from 37% to 84%. Can anyone explain
why? Perhaps it could be the manner in which I was pressing down on the
mirror.
Zones 3 and 4 were great; I just needed to reduce the center a bit. I
did just that, and with a lot of luck, the end result is what you see above.
Here is a knife edge photo:
http://www.atmlist.net/contrib/desteinhauer-at-verizon-dot-net/070507_6inch/
070506-KE-final.jpg
And a Ronchigram:
http://www.atmlist.net/contrib/desteinhauer-at-verizon-dot-net/070507_6inch/
070506-Ronchi-final.jpg
This is my first mirror, and it took me a long 20 months to complete. I
learned many lessons, though. I spent most of a year trying to get rid
of a stubborn TDE. It turned out that the problem all along was (go
figure) poor contact. I eventually realized I had an exceptionally hard
pitch lap which didn't get in good contact no matter how long I cold
pressed it. I learned to heat it up in a 90 degree (Fahrenheit) bath
and hot press it before every polishing session. What a pain that was.
I got rid of the TDE that way, though. I did 1/4 diameter strokes with
the tool on top, until the diffraction ring was faintly visible on the
right side (knife approaching from the right). Then I did 1/4 diameter
strokes with the mirror on top. I kept my polishing sessions to 5-6
minutes before I pressed again. It took some time, but eventually the
right side diffraction ring was nearly as bright as the left. Forget
about accented pressure to eliminate such a narrow TDE - that just made
things worse.
Eventually, when I was struggling with figuring, I made a new pitch lap
and wished I had done it months earlier. What a difference - I could
cold press just like everyone else.
Anyway, time to celebrate by taking my family out to dinner!
Next project: a 12.5 inch f/5 (and of course, finishing up the rest of
the 6 inch telescope). My 9 year old son will be grinding a 4 inch
mirror while I am doing my 12.5 inch. He is very excited.
David Steinhauer
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/