Re: [ATM] Subaperture Corrector for Two Mirror Telescope

["Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>]

Richard F.L.R. Snashall wrote:

>
> think maybe the best from the perspective of cost and buildability

Think again, oh antsy one (ala Carson):

    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/rc3-22x.atm
    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/rc3-22x.len
    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/rc3-22x.txt
    http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/rc3-22x.zmx

With one less lens to build, it might just be worth the cost of a
half percent performance (optics just loves to nickel and dime you
to death!;-).
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/