[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ATM] Tees instead of triangles
A picture is worth a thousand words, Kevin, or Alan.
Provide a link for us, please, so we can see this breaking of the rules of
well established engineering tradition (all trusses, Pratt, Warren,
Serrurier, etc., employ a triangle, sometimes repeated, as in my large
mounting):
http://www.atmsite.org/contrib/Harbour/Sym.Eq.Mntng.html
All of the loads in a "T" would be concentrated entirely in the joint of the
elements, it would seem to me, unless I am not understanding what you are
saying. Provide us with a link to a picture to edify us, please, if it is
not inconvenient.
The 25" "training telescope", at Cornell university, a Cassegrain, has a
tube that looks almost identical to mine, except that it employs a Pratt
Truss (diagonal strusts are essentially rods under tension, cables, so to
speak). Help us with a picture (I have one on a disc somewhere).
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Whitefire" <chaosopher23@yahoo.com>
To: "Alan K. Henderson" <alankh@ev1.net>; <atm@atmlist.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ATM] Tees instead of triangles
> Welds tend to be a little softer than the base metals.
> Other than that, unless it was welded by a drunken
> novice, it's probably OK.
>
> Kevin
>
> --- "Alan K. Henderson" <alankh@ev1.net> wrote:
> > Can't remember where I saw this, but somebody out
> > there has a large aperture
> > scope where the "triangles" are made from 1" square
> > tubing welded together
> > in a T shape. The tee would be made from either two
> > tubing sections (one
> > vertical and horizontal section each) or three (two
> > horizontal sections,
> > welded to either side of one end of the vertical).
> > If I use the two-section
> > design for my upcoming project, the center of the
> > hole for the "triangle"
> > pivot bolt would be only .22 inches from the weld;
> > assuming a quarter-inch
> > bolt, that's 1/8" distance between the edge of the
> > hole and the weld. Is
> > there any reason why drilling that close to a weld
> > (or welding that close to
> > an already-drilled hole) is a bad idea? If so, I can
> > always go with the
> > three-section alternative, even if that means extra
> > welding.
> >
> > Alan K. Henderson
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
> >
>
> This is a wonderful site filled with 600+ world-class, earth-friendly, and
people-friendly products ranging from weight loss to car care to how to make
money on the Internet. I make money when you purchase something from this
store! You can, too!https://www.ezinfocenter.com/8813281/showIndex.vstore(I
add this to all of my emails. It's at the end so you don't have to scroll
through the advertisement to get to what I wanted to say in the first place.
It's never the subject, unless you want it to be.)
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Mail
> Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
> http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
>
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/