[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ATM] WAS Magnalium....

To: "'Cary Chleborad'" <Cary@Chleborads.com>, <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: RE: [ATM] WAS Magnalium....
From: "Jerry" <wa4guu@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 00:06:22 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <03d801c55289$b3396f10$0a00a8c0@FORTRESS>
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

I thought that two way null recently suggested sounds like a great idea to
me. I think someone is going to have to come up with sliced bread to beat
that idea.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cary Chleborad
 

So...

All complete foolishness aside....  anyone have any good, convenient,
QUANTATATIVE, and PRACTICAL solutions for testing convex Cassegrain
secondaries?

-Cary




_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- [ATM] WAS Magnalium....
  - From: "Cary Chleborad" <Cary@Chleborads.com>

Prev by Author: RE: Re: [ATM] RE: Magnalium
Next by Author: RE: [ATM] ATM edge support
Prev by thread: [ATM] WAS Magnalium....
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] WAS Magnalium....
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread