Re: [ATM] Constraints on design

["Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>]

Richard wrote:

>
>
> Ah... I'd wrongly thought you meant a triplet corrector instead
> of the schmidt plate, not as well as. You must be very averse to
> hyperbolic figuring :)

Actually, listening to the list traffic, I get that impression.

But then too, maybe you are looking in the wrong direction.
Consider (looking only at visual use requirements):

n            R             t             G          D         C
STO          inf         2042.293                  600
2       -5337.293      -2042.293       mirror     609.6       0
3       -1577.699       2042.293       mirror     152.4    +7.469593 !!!
4        1996.688         19           N-BAF10    100         0
5       -99.64784          5           N-KZFS4    100         0
6        91.50806         23.5         N-KF9      100         0
7      -344.7994         402.5                                0
IMG     -295.4005

But, if you think that ellipsoid would be easy to figure...;-)

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/