[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Denstone vs water, who wins?

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Denstone vs water, who wins?
From: Mark Holm <mdholm@telerama.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:58:20 -0400
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)

ATM's have used several brands of dental stone, and, so far as I know, 
no one has reported trouble with water resistance of the cured 
material.  It is quite likely that this new brand will work as well.

Are you going to use the tile in stone method?  That is one of the big 
benefits from using dental stone.  No epoxy.  Quick and easy.

Mark Holm
mdholm@telerama.com

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Denstone vs water, who wins?
  - From: "John Graves" <jgraves@straight2you.net>

Prev by Author: [ATM] Re: Weird Foucault readings
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] First project
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] Denstone vs water, who wins?
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Denstone vs water, who wins?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread