Re: First Light & Question

Bob Madden (madden@netcom.com)
Mon, 27 Mar 1995 08:17:49 -0800 (PST)

Wull Steve, from your tale there seems to be one thing you didn't mention, however, you did take someone's word for it. Is the focal length really 59.0 inches? Humn, I wonder?

BTW, how did the images look? Are you happy with them? Hope so.

Bob

):-{])) <---- madden@netcom.com madden@svpal.org Remember amateur astronomers: "keep looking for the next Universe"

On Mon, 27 Mar 1995, Steve Scampini wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Just experienced first light with my first scope, a ten inch Dob. I had
> to hand hold it (the base is not complete) but it still was a kick. A
> question for the forum:
>
> Everything went well except I came up about 0.3 inch short on my expected
> in-travel. I measured everything at least five times before cutting the
> mounting holes. I measured the focal plane of the eyepiece relative to
> the mounting shoulder (got about 5 mm distal to the eye, manufacturer
> says about 6 mm, OK). I purchased the mirror (didn't have the time to
> push glass). It was marked as 59" focal length and I asked and was told
> it was 59.0" "exactly". I would assume +/- 0.1 inches. I have measured
> everything twice after putting the thing together and still no clue.
> At this point the scope is very roughly colliminated, just by sighting
> by eye but all the mental experiments I do cannot account for 0.3 inches of
> error due to collimation effects.
>
> Bottom line is I can live with the about 0.4 inches of in travel ( I was
> shooting for 0.75 inches to give myself some error margin) but the lack of
> explanation is bugging me.
>
> I keep thinking it may be the mirror but then I think I maybe overlooking
> the obvious. I accounted for:
>
> *Secondary offset
> *Shim plate thickness under the focuser (to give something solid for the
> collimating set screws to push off against)
> * Secondary mount to spider geometry (in fact I made a special fixture to
> measure this external to the scope prior to mounting).
> * Primary to mounting bolts including the radius of curvature of the primary
> * Racked in focuser height
> * Tube wall thickness
> * Tube diameter
>
> It may be that the primary is offset in the tube in a radial fashion but
> can this effect plane of focus?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Steve Scampini
>