[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Cassegrain, primary mirror perforation size

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Cassegrain, primary mirror perforation size
From: Otterstedt@t-online.de (Heiner Otterstedt)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:25:04 +0100
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20070228191533.036067c8@hughes.net>
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20070228191533.036067c8@hughes.net>
Reply-to: heiner@otterstedt.de
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)

Hi Michael,

I have to apologize for the confusion I caused! Mea Culpa!

 > For some reason Heiner wants over a 58mm diameter shielded field.

My desired field of view is 29.3 mm. I falsely assumed the field sizes 
in your spreadsheet had to be given as diameter, while they obviously 
have to be given as semi-diameter. This insight makes everything much 
more clear to me. Thanks a lot!

Regards, Heiner

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Cassegrain, primary mirror perforation size
  - From: Michael Peck <mlpeck@hughes.net>
- Re: [ATM] Cassegrain, primary mirror perforation size
  - From: Richard <cnc@cncservo.co.uk>

Prev by Author: [ATM] Help with TDE
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Cassegrain, primary mirror perforation size
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] BEESWAX....Creation of an old lap substance....
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Cassegrain, primary mirror perforation size
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread