[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] An intriguing toy

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] An intriguing toy
From: "Bob May" <bobmay@nethere.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:27:42 -0800
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20050313.195929.-211825.0.jkoptic@juno.com>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

If the correctors are molded and not ground/polished, I'd suspect that the
optics are nowhere near diffraction limited.
Considering the application, I wouldn't be supprised if 100 waves of error
would be an excellent set of optics as the projector will be taking a spot
of maybe .001" and putting it up on the wall about 100 times larger.
Bob May
bobmay@nethere.com
http://nav.to/bobmay
http://bobmay.astronomy.net

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] An intriguing toy
  - From: Bevan Harris <ngc2070@bigpond.com>

References:
- Re: [ATM] An intriguing toy
  - From: Jarvis Krumbein <jkoptic@juno.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Grinding question
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Grinding question 2
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] An intriguing toy
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] An intriguing toy
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread