Re: [ATM] The Challange and the limit

[DHA352@aol.com]

In a message dated 3/11/2005 11:38:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
jdbaterson@msn.com writes:

>I think this 1:6 business of diameter to thickness must be a relic of 
foolishness, >since we know that it needs be possible to produce the self-standing 
form that is >very thin and maintains itself. 
 
Call me a newbee.  But, I think all of this depends on your goal.  For one 
person portables - I agree.  But for permanent environment controlled settings I 
just don't see the advantage.  
 


_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/