Re: [ATM] The zonal Foucault test is free of inherent correction bias

[Ken Lowther <hermit@outofoptions.org>]

Quoting Michael Peck <mpeck1@ix.netcom.com>:

> This is being crossposted to both the ATM list and ATM_FREE. For the 
> benefit of those on the atm list who haven't followed recent threads 
> on ATM_FREE, a hypothesis has been advanced that zonal Foucault tests 
> are biased towards undercorrection, at least for relatively large, 
> fast mirrors.

Isn't this why we tried the 'round robin'?  I can see differences by f 
ratio, but why would size matter?  Or do we create a class that we 
aren't likely to be able to do the same for and declare it an exception 
for discussions sake?



Ken

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/