[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] convex secondary

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] convex secondary
From: "Jonathan Lavoie" <atm@lavoielactee.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:22:49 -0500
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <007101c51c9a$a41e07e0$2b348342@joehome><00e301c51d0d$ee3331c0$2b348342@joehome><4225EBCC.4020706@uiuc.edu><010d01c51d15$42f09930$2b348342@joehome><42261117.6010404@uiuc.edu>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Lockwood" <melockwo@uiuc.edu>
To: "Jonathan Lavoie" <atm@lavoielactee.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ATM] convex secondary


> Jonathan,
>
> Jonathan Lavoie wrote:
>> Around F2.9
>
> Ouch.  That's fast.  Down to about F/3.5 I'd be happy with careful Focault 
> testing, but it sounds like this is in the Caustic testing realm.
>
> What's the conic constant?
>

According to Richard the K is almost -5. Didn't do the calculation myself...
still learning to use the software MODAS. 

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] convex secondary
  - From: Mike Lockwood <melockwo@uiuc.edu>

References:
- Re: [ATM] convex secondary
  - From: Jonathan Lavoie <atm@lavoielactee.net>
- Re: [ATM] convex secondary
  - From: Mike Lockwood <melockwo@uiuc.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] convex secondary
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] convex secondary
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] convex secondary
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] convex secondary
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread