[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Effects of a too small secondary

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] Effects of a too small secondary
From: "Bob May" <bobmay@nethere.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:08:14 -0700
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <003101c694a3$490a9c10$1500000a@gray>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

Why not build something a bit different?  There is the Mersenne
design which will be great with that size of mirror and then
there is the Stevick-Paul design, either of which will make the
scope a lot more accessable to the user.
I've gotten sort of bored with everybody just building another
Newtonian Dob.
Bob May
bobmay at nethere.com
http: slash /nav.to slash bobmay
http: slash /bobmay dot astronomy.net
Replace the obvious words with the proper character.

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- [ATM] Effects of a too small secondary
  - From: "Steve Chambers" <Steve@pmdo.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Small Dob truss question
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Width of Dome Slit?
Previous by thread: [ATM] Effects of a too small secondary
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Effects of a too small secondary
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread