Re: [ATM] Unique New Equatorial Platform Design

[DU <desiredusername@gmail.com>]

I agree that talking about different historical EQ designs and ways of
combining same doesn't seem off-topic, but wouldn't talk of IP be
*capitalist* nonsense, not socialist?

On 6/13/06, Woodchuck <djv@bedford.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Michael Lindner wrote:
>
> > For these reasons I must ask that (1) you remove the commercial from
> your
> > signature in future posts, and (2) this thread continue off-list. We'd
> all
> > love to help refine and share information about EQ platforms, and I'd
> love to
> > see a new thread devoted to that purpose, but I think the current thread
> is
> > more about IP, and less about EQ, as Jeff noticed.
>
> I'm afraid this terminates my association with this mailing list.
>
> As far as IP goes (and may you choke on your socialist nonsense
> someday) the author in an early post disavowed any claim to IP
> rights.
>
> The idea that referring to an amateur's homepage where some small
> pamphlet can be purchased is completely absurd.
>
> Dave
> --
>       The law has converted plunder into a right and lawful defense
>       into a crime.  -- Frederic Bastiat, 1850
>
> _______________________________________________
> ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
>
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/