RE: [ATM] flex produced optics and Patents 101

[Michael Peck <mpeck1@ix.netcom.com>]

At 16:23 6/16/05, mbyorick wrote:
>The sole independent claim in the patent referenced above (U.S.
>6,425,671 to Adler) reads:

>John does not describe the 'atm magazine' method with sufficient
>specificity to allow a determination of whether it qualifies as prior
>art with respect to the specific language of the claim at issue.  The


>However, if that "old atm magazine" article describes a system which
>falls within the ambit of the above claim language (or which is broader
>in scope), including each of the above-mentioned limitations, then the

I think he may have in mind the article by Alan Adler (with contributions 
from Bill Kelley and Howard Moore) in the November 2000 S&T, "Flexing 
spheres...".

Mike Peck


------
Michael Peck
mpeck1@ix.netcom.com

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/