Re: [ATM] RE: ATM Schiefspieglers in Oslo LT

["Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>]

Michael Lindner wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2004 10:48 pm, Donald Good wrote:
> 
>>I can't believe that there would be a 10000% (i.e. 100x) distortion...
> 
> 
> Me either. that's why I was wondering...if the distortion is being computed 
> wrong for some reason, can we trust the spots or other numbers...I don't mean 
> to cast doubts on your work, I just want to understand the significance of 
> the results.

In the third order, this measure of distortion is the ratio of two
cubics (cubics in field angle).  Is it possible what you are seeing
is a limiting effect?

-- 

Rick S.

http://users.rcn.com/rflrs

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/