[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?

To: Michael Lindner <mikell@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
From: Daniel Fundo <fundo@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:09:13 +0100
CC: Ken Hunter <kb7h@onemain.com>, Peter John Smith <pjifl@bigpond.com.au>, atm@shore.net
References: <3B35EDC4.A865BEF9@stratos.net> <0GFF00MLLU4L5L@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <028f01c0fd54$b6fd2ee0$5e488690@oemcomputer> <006201c0fde5$65d88280$03cbd4cc@kh1011207> <0GFJ00LN2Q60T0@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
Reply-To: Daniel Fundo <fundo@bellsouth.net>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net


>From Mike Linder:

<<  I also chuckle at the folks who say they saw <your favorite object
here> at 179x. ( not 180x).  >>

Hey......I put my eyepiece focal lengths on a spread sheet down the left
hand column and the different telescopes I use across the top, and let
the spreadsheet figure it out.  I ain't gonna argue with Bill G.'s Excel
!!!!  If it says 179.45683x, that's what it is!!!!

With tongue deeply embedded in chubby cheek <G>
*****-----
Dan F.
Secretary/MAS
Memphis, TN

References:
- ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
  - From: Lawrence Sayre <lsayre@stratos.net>
- Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
  - From: Michael Lindner <mikell@optonline.net>
- Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
  - From: "Peter John Smith" <pjifl@bigpond.com.au>
- Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
  - From: "Ken Hunter" <kb7h@onemain.com>
- Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
  - From: Michael Lindner <mikell@optonline.net>

Prev by Author: Re: ATM Small Newt Plans?
Next by Author: Re: ATM Tile question...
Prev by thread: Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
Next by thread: Re: ATM TEX vs Figure34.exe?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread