[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] [Fwd: Re: Betr.: Re: cutting a big piece of plate glass - Polarizer]

Subject: Re: [ATM] [Fwd: Re: Betr.: Re: cutting a big piece of plate glass - Polarizer]
From: hermit <hermit@outofoptions.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:06:11 -0400
Cc: ATM <atm@atmlist.net>
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
In-reply-to: <4697CB3C.10706@austin.rr.com>
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4697CB3C.10706@austin.rr.com>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620)

Jeff Rowe wrote:
> Friends;
> Prior to ~20 years ago 99% of all camera polarizer filters were linear. 
> Yea!!! I believe the change to "circular" came about due to the meter 
> sensors in SLRs. I have a pile of both and much prefer the linear. They 
> are very out of vogue, there might be issues with digital chips as well. 
>   
My son shoots digital and said a circular is a MUST for them.  He did 
the research.  I just believe him. ;)

Ken Lowther
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- [ATM] [Fwd: Re: Betr.: Re: cutting a big piece of plate glass - Polarizer]
  - From: Jeff Rowe <jeffrowe@austin.rr.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Musing upon 20" fused silica blank
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Mirror Scratches- and no tile tool available
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] [Fwd: Re: Betr.: Re: cutting a big piece of plate glass - Polarizer]
Next by thread: [ATM] [Fwd: Re: VIVA towels protect optical surfaces?]
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread