Re: [ATM] over&under correction.

[Bob <astropabob@yahoo.com.au>]

Hi Richard,
	Your absolutely right, it gets very difficult to follow sometimes.
Some of the messages are almost cryptic lately. You said what
I've been privately cussing about.

Bob


Richard wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> 
> Monday, July 11, 2005, 5:41:38 PM, you wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> SM> Not only is there no difference in summary quality measures, the in focus
> SM> diffraction patterns are exactly the same. Also, the extrafocal diffraction
> SM> pattern in one case exactly matches the infrafocal diffraction pattern in
> SM> the other for the same amount of focus travel. So, based solely on optical
> SM> theory there's no difference at all between the two cases.

<snip>

> Scott, can you please use the normal > quote symbol when
> quoting. What with lack of quote marking and digest replies
> containing unmarked excerpts from several messages, many
> messages on this list are getting impossible to follow or place
> in thread. Sorry for quoting the whole message here but I
> thought it was needed.




_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/