[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ATM] RE;1/8,1/16-1/20th debate.
Michael Peck wrote:
>
>
>
>> Just OK Mirror UNDER corrected (Conic Constant = -0.05)
>>
>> P-V WF on axis = 0.25 waves (1/4)
>> RMS WF ON-Axis = 0.075 waves (1/13)
>> Strehl on-axis = 0.802
>>
>> P-V WF 1/4 degree off axis = 1.15 Waves
>> RMS WF 1/4 degree Off Axis = 0.10 wave (1/10)
>> Strehl 1/4 degree off axis = 0.651
>>
>
> By the way the P-V error for the off axis field position above is high
> by about a factor of 2. How much did you pay for that copy of Zemax?
>
> Mike Peck
>
>
Actually, take your pick:-)
on-axis P-V on-axis RMS off-axis P-V off-axis RMS
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------
ZEMAX 0.2511 0.0740 1.1877 0.2202
ATMOS 0.2469 0.0739 0.7201 0.1427
OSLO 0.2857 0.08224 0.5765 0.1099
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/