Re: [ATM] Transverse Error

[Mike Lockwood <melockwo@uiuc.edu>]

Alexis,

Alexis Cousein wrote:
> Mike Lockwood wrote:
>> Rays are still good enough, IMO.
> 
> No argument from me. When you're making a mirror and an error
> sticks out like a sore thumb and can be fixed, you'd better
> fix it rather than lose your time in finding out if it's worth
> fixing.
> It's just the loose terminology that prompted me to respond.
> I *was* saying I was being a nit, wasn't I?

Yes, I just thought I should explain my reasoning.

If I can see a transverse error issue, I fix it, and since the mirror 
is generally quite smooth anyway, I end up with a very good optic.

	Mike Lockwood




_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/