[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Secondary Offset



waldo kitty wrote:
> Mitchell R wrote:
>> Hm Okay. Normally I sort of just eye ball it, there is no way for me to
>> truly center it under the focuser so I just adjust it till it looks centered
>> under the focuser, hopefully that is offsetting it enough.
> 
> the real question is... /does it work for you?/ if the image thru the eyepiece 
> looks round and the image doesn't have any deformities or coma and such, it is 
> probably ok ;)
> 
Lack of offset never causes aberrations, just a smaller fully illuminated field,
or one not centred around the on-axis object.

-- 
Alexis Cousein                                  al@sgi.com
Senior Systems Engineer/Solutions Architect     SGI/Silicon Graphics
--
<If I have seen further, it is by standing on reference manuals>

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/