[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Testing Techniques

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] Testing Techniques
From: "Mitchell R" <funnybone101@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:31:28 -0500
Authentication-results: smtp09.embarq.synacor.com smtp.mail=funnybone101@embarqmail.com; spf=neutral
Authentication-results: smtp09.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=funnybone101@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
In-reply-to: <000001c84a57$2c156930$6601a8c0@dmp>
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <000001c84a57$2c156930$6601a8c0@dmp>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
Thread-index: AchKVyiL5bQBcTUMQZ+QhWOMkMXNagDSGEqQ
X_cmae_category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined

     Thanks to everyone for your advice, I am confident in my readings. Just
finished my 10" F/4.8 and it came out 1/17.7 P-V Wavefront. With careful
testing all readings came out relatively close and all better than 1/9 Wave.
(I took 2 sets on each of 2 axes for a total of 4 sets and plugged them in
individually, then altogether, into Figure XP, and ran Monte Carlo analyses,
etc.)

Mitch

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Not tde or tue, important oblate spheroid, ellipsoid
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Testing Techniques
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] testing convex surfaces by reflection - a thought experiment
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Testing Techniques
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread