[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[ATM] Lurie-Houghton (was) : Schmidt-Cassegrain

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: [ATM] Lurie-Houghton (was) : Schmidt-Cassegrain
From: Guy Brandenburg <gfbrandenburg@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:25:52 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;b=C4q4xYM3eZtibN3t1CMcKW4m77XowyMa9/EaUTI044dcf6+TMlDutkvc9W7mfGIsDAwCZVBDxYsVqv279Aw14XyiP6dPJ+meLYDhuO451zMe84eGipfGNrzk/lei8ecsA8U+xTrW76xlrPlV5D/3S+gMdnGzfwoIHHZmT3eu1EE=;
In-Reply-To: <110170-220051110204015875@copper.net>
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

Does anybody have any thoughts on how sensitive to
collimation problems a Lurie Houghton might be, say,
at f/6?
Guy B
--- vlad@copper.net wrote:

> Jean-Guy,
> 
> You are right, the three mirror systems, 
> especially with this fast primary, are sensitive
> to anything one can think of. ............

=====
Guy  Brandenburg
Washington, DC
My home page:
http://home.earthlink.net/~gfbranden/GFB_Home_Page.html
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Lurie-Houghton (was) : Schmidt-Cassegrain
  - From: "vladimir sacek" <vlad@copper.net>

References:
- [ATM] Re: Schmidt-Cassegrain
  - From: vlad@copper.net

Prev by Author: RE: [ATM] Dry Polishing?
Next by Author: [ATM] fun with a lathe
Prev by thread: [ATM] Re: Schmidt-Cassegrain
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Lurie-Houghton (was) : Schmidt-Cassegrain
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread