[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] considering different design

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] considering different design
From: "Bob May" <bobmay@nethere.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:47:52 -0800
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <893360.1105295401231.JavaMail.root@wamui10.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

I've looked through it myself and found that the image was quite nice.  I
didn't have the time to test for quality nor even thought of it.  I was
quite attached to the idea of being able to hang on the eyepiece without any
disturbance of the image at all, the concrete and steel of the dome being
quite a bit heavier than myself.  All in all, a rock solid scope that you
can touch without any problems of flexure.
Bob May
bobmay@nethere.com
http://nav.to/bobmay
http://bobmay.astronomy.net

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- Re: [ATM] considering different design
  - From: jeffmorgan@mindspring.com

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Mirrors
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] considering different design
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] considering different design
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] considering different design
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread