Fwd: Re: [ATM] Re: ATM pitch mold, opinions needed

[Ken Lowther <hermit@outofoptions.com>]

Quoting tkrajci@san.osd.mil:

>
> I repeat my previous post:  “...books are usually reviewed for content and
> accuracy...”  Note the use of the word ‘usually.’  Yes, there are errors
> in ATM books.  However I often find a higher S/N ratio in books than I do
> in email forums.
>

Even many die hard computer geeks think the computer is a bad 'page turner'.  It
isn't the same reading experience.  MUCH of what is in the books holds up
today.  Plus, we inherit a tradition.  Take things unquestioned? NEVER.  But
that cuts both ways. If someone feels that the books are that bad, perhaps
those persons should take to documenting that instead of making blanket
statements on a list that should be dedicated to fact.  OK.  Hindle didn't have
a computer to work with.  We have already been there and hashed that one out