[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?

To: Ric Rokosz <radicell2@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
From: Hermit <klowther@cisnet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:42:14 -0500
CC: Peter John Smith <pjifl@bigpond.com.au>, atm@shore.net
References: <20020117152702.40152.qmail@web13108.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Hermit <klowther@cisnet.com>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net

Ric Rokosz wrote:
> 
> Yes,he did patent it - the use of the really small
> secondary for long focus scopes, ....can you believe
> it. The US patent office is a joke...
> 

They will grant a patent for just about anything.  Many don't hold up in
court though.  Seems the just don't do the research at the patent office
they should.

-- 
Ken Lowther
Youngstown, Ohio
http://www.atmsite.org
http://www.atmsite.org/mailman/listinfo/atmswap
http://www.atmsite.org/mailman/listinfo/raytrace

References:
- Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
  - From: Ric Rokosz <radicell2@yahoo.com>

Prev by Author: Re: ATM Making JB Weld Gears
Next by Author: Re: ATM Another dangerous thought
Prev by thread: Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
Next by thread: Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread