[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?

To: <atm@shore.net>
Subject: Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
From: "Nils Olof Carlin" <nilsolof.carlin@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:02:09 +0100
References: <3.0.6.32.20020115133143.007d0100@pvtnetworks.net> <3C44C366.285989A5@mwt.net>
Reply-To: "Nils Olof Carlin" <nilsolof.carlin@telia.com>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net


> Please check out the below page of a project of a EXTREME long F-Ratio
> scope I was thinking of trying.  what's everyone think?
> 
> http://www.qsl.net/wb9sbd/path.html

"Baffling" is the word that comes to my mind.

Nils Olof

References:
- Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
  - From: Andy Saulietis <iss@pvtnetworks.net>
- Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
  - From: Joe Mayenschein <mayen1@mwt.net>

Prev by Author: Re: ATM Question: topped down 16" f/3.9
Next by Author: Re: ATM Non lasing lerer diode Question
Prev by thread: Re: ATM 16" F/33 - Patents
Next by thread: Re: ATM 16" F/33 valid design?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread