[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ATM] ATM Digest, Vol 50, Issue 31
Hi all
I'm traveling and will be back Thur.
Better email - gregj@eclipse-t.com
Greg Jones
503.442.2928
-----Original Message-----
From: atm-request@atmlist.net
Subj: ATM Digest, Vol 50, Issue 31
Date: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:00 pm
Size: 3K
To: atm@atmlist.net
Send ATM mailing list submissions to
atm@atmlist.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
atm-request@atmlist.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
atm-owner@atmlist.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ATM digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: subdiameter lap controversies? (Scott Ewart)
2. Re: draper (Dominic-Luc Webb)
3. Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (Carl Vehmeyer)
4. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic
(astroguy@nas.com)
5. Re: subdiameter lap controversies? (Mike Lockwood)
6. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (Carl Vehmeyer)
7. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (kreig)
8. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic
(Francis J. O'Reilly)
9. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic
(Charles Broward)
10. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic
(Jarvis Krumbein)
11. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (kreig)
12. Re: Cassegrain Secondary Magnification (Arjan te Marvelde)
13. OH B*****KS (Neil Booker)
14. Re: Cassegrain Secondary Magnification (Alfredo Rainho Neves)
15. Re: OH B*****KS (Jarvis Krumbein)
16. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (Carl Vehmeyer)
17. Re: Cassegrain Secondary Magnification (Rod Brackenridge)
18. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (Scott Ewart)
19. Re: Help my 17.5 inch coulter mirror is astigmatic (Don R Surles)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:30:19 -0500
From: "Scott Ewart" <scotte@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] subdiameter lap controversies?
To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Message-ID: <00e201c87838$ad4d5fd0$07e81f70$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Bob,
I'm just trying to save him some time. When I made my 12.4", I
never got very close to a sphere and never tried. If I started to go in
that direction, I changed direction. My goal was only a paraboloid. When I
got a zone, I worked on fixing it. I turned the edge more than once, then I
fixed it. I think I went through 5 different sized tools along the way. It
turned out the 10" worked best, at least for me. And yes, I was overcorrect
a few times too. Getting everything fixed all at once was the trick. But I
did persist and my mirror does test at 1/20th wave.
I suppose there are those with experience that may be able to easily
figure a smooth sphere, then quickly proceed to a smooth paraboloid. I envy
those people, but I'll never make enough mirrors to reach the level of
control and consistency. As the first-timer I was though, I doubt that I
could have made a decent sphere any quicker than a paraboloid, and I suspect
many ATMs are in the same category. That's why I don't recommend spending
time chasing two goals. I think experienced mirror makers may like to start
from a sphere because it's quicker for them, but that doesn't mean it's best
for everyone.
Scott Ewart
-----Original Message-----
From: atm-bounces@atmlist.net [mailto:atm-bounces@atmlist.net] On Behalf Of
Bob May
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:08 AM
To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] subdiameter lap controversies?
The problem is more that going from a hyperboloid down to a
paraboloid often just doesn't happen that way. Often the outer
zzones go spherical, leaving a hole in the center. Also you
often end up with a bit of rolled edge to go with that. If you
--- message truncated ---
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/