[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Baffled Observatory Slit

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] Baffled Observatory Slit
From: "Mel Bartels" <mbartels@bbastrodesigns.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:47:24 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <43F8AD07.90703@compusmart.ab.ca>
List-Archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

> anything an actual comparison might show. I was wondering why I'd given
> up bothering with this list for so long...


Trying to correlate shrouds with barely perceptible changes in visibility
when much greater effects are not controlled is my point.

The most effective shroud is the one that should be over your head when you
observe.  That makes a several tenths of a magnitude difference.

Mel Bartels



_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- [ATM] Baffled Observatory Slit
  - From: Jay Kirkland <jaykirk2@compusmart.ab.ca>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Mike Lockwood's Planetary
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Ronchi profile technique
Prev by thread: [ATM] Baffled Observatory Slit
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Baffled Observatory Slit
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread