[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter

To: atm@atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
From: Lawrence Sayre <lsayre@neo.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:17:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <003b01c6306f$44bedce0$6502a8c0@pc>
List-Archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BAY101-F348B82AB2F3E8B5CA050BDB8020@phx.gbl><43ECE0FC.8020709@uiuc.edu> <003201c62fba$9f2a2640$6502a8c0@pc><003b01c6306f$44bedce0$6502a8c0@pc>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)

Stathis Kafalis wrote:

>For which maximum field do you people size the secondary ring and why?
>
>  
>
I use the mirror diameter + 46 mm (or one field stop of maximum size) 
method.  I don't want to suffer from any aperture stop-down loss with 
the widest possible field stop eyepieces.

Lawrence Sayre

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- [ATM] Moulded mirrors
  - From: "Russell Jocoy" <russjocoy@hotmail.com>
- Re: [ATM] Moulded mirrors
  - From: Mike Lockwood <melockwo@uiuc.edu>
- [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
  - From: "Stathis Kafalis" <info@stathis-firstlight.de>
- Re: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
  - From: "Stathis Kafalis" <info@stathis-firstlight.de>

Prev by Author: [ATM] pesky oblate spheroid
Next by Author: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread