[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
For which maximum field do you people size the secondary ring and why?
- no vigneting at maximum Wide Field (for example for a 31 mm Nagler, 35 mm
Panoptic etc..)
- the 100% illuminated field only
- 1/2° field
Greetings
Stathis Kafalis
www.stathis-firstlight.de
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stathis Kafalis" <info@stathis-firstlight.de>
To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: [ATM] Minimum inner tube diameter
How to determine the minimum inner tube diameter (=inner upper ring diameter
for open truss tube design)?
I thought, this is a simple question, but it seems not.
My method so far is:
- no vignetting of light path with the widest field eyepiece
Rule of thumb:
Inner Tube Diameter= Mirror Diameter + Field Stop Diameter
more exactly, like shown in Andy's Excel sheed:
http://www.stathis-firstlight.de/atm/kyklopas_fov_and_baffle_calculations.xls
Others say, that the secondary mirror is usually sized to illuminate the edge
of the field of such a widest field to 75% or 70% only, so the upper ring can
be made smaller as well. Going this way, it's sufficient to make the upper
ring only as large, as is needed for the 100% illuminated field determined by
the secondary mirror.
In David Kriege's book (page 154+154) he says, that no vignetting of 0.5°
field is sufficient.
What is right?
Stathis Kafalis
www.stathis-firstlight.de
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/