[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[ATM] Fw: Sixtests and P-V Error
- Subject: [ATM] Fw: Sixtests and P-V Error
- From: ulhas_ngp at sancharnet.in (Ulhas Deshpande)
- Date: Fri Feb 27 15:35:52 2004
I had sent this message earlier but did not seem to make it to the list. So
sending again
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ulhas Deshpande" <ulhas_ngp@sancharnet.in>
To: <atm_free@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February, 2004 11:11
Subject: Sixtests and P-V Error
>
>
> Hello all
> James Burrows Six test programme does not give the P-V values for the
> mirror
> under test,perhaps for valid reasons. However can his be done?
> If we take the RMS error shown by Sixtests and devide by the wavelength
> would this give the RMS P-V error. Similarly if the peak to valley
distance
> in nm was measured form the surface error curve and devided by wavelength
> would this be the P-V Error?
> For example I sent my mirror of for coating when I got a Strehl of 0.959
> and
> an RMS error of 9.9 nm.
> Does this translate to an RMS P-V error of 9.9/550= 1/55.5 waves !!!.
> Similarly the Peak to Valley diff on the surface error curve is 40 nm i.e
> 40/550= 1/13.75 waves
>
> Is this right?
> Thanks
> Ulhas
>
>