[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names

Subject: [ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names
From: mwarne at network2000-hi.com (Mike Warne)
Date: Tue Feb 24 05:02:01 2004
References: <Law9-F78WrGW6Ex3Akw00005c4b@hotmail.com><002d01c3fa40$3baf48e0$22823f42@p120><2825.64.58.201.179.1077564573.squirrel@www.eies.com>

I agree, this new list is working out great.
List administrators have to make difficult decisions sometimes, here's some
info on this controversial subject.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Sorry for being slightly  OT...
Mike  Warne.

----- Original Message -----
> > The only odditiy of the new list is that I still have to change the TO:
> > field like I did when using the old list.  Apparently, the reply to
> > field is still being generated to the person rather than the list
> > address.

References:
- [ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names
  - From: russjocoy at hotmail.com (Russell Jocoy)
- [ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names
  - From: bobmay at nethere.com (Bob May)
- [ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names
  - From: tom at moulton.us (Tom Moulton)

Prev by Author: [ATM] Conic Constant
Next by Author: FW: [ATM] Back of my blank
Prev by thread: [ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names
Next by thread: [ATM] NEW LIST--Old Names, New names
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread