[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[ATM] Re: RTV Considered Harmful
- Subject: [ATM] Re: RTV Considered Harmful
- From: frank at ucla.edu (Frank Henriquez)
- Date: Wed Feb 11 09:23:16 2004
- In-Reply-To: <200402102326.i1ANQdQE023249@periwinkle.noc.ucla.edu>
- References: <200402102326.i1ANQdQE023249@periwinkle.noc.ucla.edu>
I've been following this discussion with interest. I've never made a
mirror larger than a standard thickness 8", so bear with me as I ask
some questions:
Why are all these mirrors being glued *TO* the RTV dots? Why not use
the RTV dots as cushions and only apply the mirror once the dots are
cured (ie, the mirror is loose, not glued). The give of the RTV should
provide some flotation, and a similar edge support should keep it from
flopping around in its cell. On the 24" in Astronomy (the only big
mirror I'm familiar with) the flotation cell had teflon (or nylon - it
looked & felt like teflon, though) pads on the triangles, and several
brass screws (with teflon pads glued to their tips) provided just
enough force to keep the mirror from flopping around. The mirror also
had cork tipped clips to keep it in its cell - which some "helpful"
graduate student thought had to be screwed down tight. This was the
only time I'd seen any cell induced distortion on the mirror.
So again, why not let the mirror float/slide on the
RTV/Teflon/nylon/cork pads in the cell?
Frank
--
Frank Henriquez Programmer/Analyst Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA
frank@ucla.edu http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~frank/index.htm